Rated 3 de
5 por
Marwood de
A major downgradeI bought these, thinking they'd be the same as the Technical Trousers I bought a year ago but they were completely different and a little worse in every way. The design was simpler, using a cheaper-feeling fabric throughout, rather than a differing fabrics for the outer and linings. No zippers on pockets and tighter cut around the thighs mean they're less useful on the bike. They're just over-priced hiking pants now.
Fecha de publicación: 2023-09-19
Rated 3 de
5 por
Anónimo de
Taken cost out of previous generation trousersGood but not as good as old version . Reason is clear - by removing zips from front pockets and changing other details they removed cost from manufacture while maintaining retail cost . Shame. Keep dripping these kind of commercial decisions through the product range and they will kill the brand - hey but maybe they know they are moving downmarket ? Who knows
Fecha de publicación: 2023-06-26
Rated 1 de
5 por
Maverick Rider de
Returned: If you own the originals don’t buy theseI LOVE the original technical trousers and own several. Purchased these for the new color. SHOCKED by the step down in design and fabric - especially the pockets. The fabric is thin and does not lay well (question how they will hold up). The pockets are no longer sleek with zippers. This new version feels cheap all around. I returned them. Too bad.
Fecha de publicación: 2023-07-06
Rated 3 de
5 por
Henry L de
Previous version was betterThey had a previous version of these trousers that tapered in at the bottom and had zips on the main pockets. They were just better trousers and I miss those being made.
This doesn’t detract from them being well made and a good pair of trouser / chino just a bit gutted they changed them.
Fecha de publicación: 2023-07-02
Rated 1 de
5 por
Cwoods de
Major step backwardsThe new style is terrible. No zipper pockets, strange fit and sizing. Please bring back the previous version. Not sure what’s happening at Rapha but all of my favorite pieces of kit are getting redesigned, and not in a good way IMHO.
Fecha de publicación: 2023-08-20
Rated 3 de
5 por
gwbaun de
Rapha Jettisons QualityI own 6 pair of these technical pants. I was very disappointed to see Rapha eliminated the zippers on the side and back pockets. What was the point. Very stupid an cheap. I’m very disappointed to note that Rapha is losing its identity. Not the quality I am used to, and definitel loss of style.
Fecha de publicación: 2023-10-29
Rated 3 de
5 por
Rapha buyer de
new Rapha trousers 2023The cut has changed. Pockets are also different. OK but not as good as the old one.
Fecha de publicación: 2023-07-07
Rated 5 de
5 por
Rowrider de
The Best or nothingThe latest edition of these trousers is a significant improvement over the former one, already very good. The fabrics now have more stretch and the pockets are improved. Particularly cool is the side pocket which elegantly stores the phone in a convenient place for cycling. Always impressive how this resists to dirt, how easy it is to clean and how, in this version, the water repelling surface works. Equally impression the reduced packing space of these, making them ideal for travel. Perfect also as comfortable smart casual business outfit. Hence the old Mercedes slogan seems appropriate.
Would these fit a woman? Please make women’s fit!
Preguntado por: Dresseslikeaman
Yes, if you know your inseam and waist measurement this will help you find the best fit for you.
Respondida por: Caitlin Rapha
Fecha de publicación: 2024-01-12
can you share the actual length of this product?
Preguntado por: takeo
The inseam lengths are 28 / 31.5 / 32 inches across sizes.
Respondida por: Rapha CS APAC
Fecha de publicación: 2024-01-31
What are the waist and inseam sizes for W28-L28, W28-L31.5, and W30?
Preguntado por: ilichpak
W28 = 38cm half / 76cm full
W30 = 40.5cm half / 81cm full
L28 = Short length
L31.5 = Regular length
L32= Long length
Respondida por: Rapha CS APAC
Fecha de publicación: 2023-10-03
Hi, please advise what is the length of the L32 in cm? I'm in the middle between L32 / L34 so would be great to know! Thank!
Preguntado por: Bart76
Hello, the leg length on both of these sizes are listed as L and because of this the both will have a 87 cm inseam.
Respondida por: RebeccaC
Fecha de publicación: 2023-09-23
Can you share the actual waist dimensions vs. tagged size?
Preguntado por: BeEff
28 = 38cm half / 76cm full
30 = 40.5cm half / 81cm full
32 = 43cm half / 86cm full
34 = 45.5cm half / 91cm full
36 = 48cm half / 96cm full
Respondida por: HannahH
Fecha de publicación: 2023-09-22
From the pictures of the grey and black version of the pants, it appears that the reflective logo inside the leg is on the *left* side, in contrast to the description in the text and all other colours, where the reflective logo is on the right side?
Preguntado por: Shining Raven
The print on the inside pant leg is on the right leg (drivetrain side).
Respondida por: HannahH
Fecha de publicación: 2023-10-20
How wide is the the bottom opening of the pant
Preguntado por: TCR1
28 = 17.2cm half / 34.4cm full
30 = 18cm half / 36cm full
32 = 18.8cm half / 37.6cm full
34 = 19.3cm half /38.6cm full
36 = 20.1cm half / 40.2cm full
Respondida por: HannahH
Fecha de publicación: 2023-09-22
How large is the leg opening at the ankle?
Preguntado por: AWL3
28 = 17.2cm half / 34.4cm full
30 = 18cm half / 36cm full
32 = 18.8cm half / 37.6cm full
34 = 19.3cm half /38.6cm full
36 = 20.1cm half / 40.2cm full