RCC Members Get More
RCC 會員選擇急件快遞享有半價優惠。請加入我們以享受更多會員權益。
介紹
重點特色：
- 適合市區騎乘及日常穿著的多元用途、科技化休閒長褲
- 以經久耐用的強韌梭織面料製作而成
- 耐久性防潑水處理 (DWR) 可抵擋陣雨突襲
- 紋理內裡襯布提升了親膚舒適度
- 兩個正面口袋、兩個後口袋和一個側邊拉鏈口袋創造出最大化的安全收納空間
- 褲腰後側加高剪裁增加了騎車時所需的覆蓋度
- 瀏覽我們的 Lifestyle 系列可見更多騎車和日常活動穿著兩相宜的休閒服飾
建議穿搭方式：
細節與材質
- 建議穿著天候：在溫和偏涼至炎熱的天氣下進行市區騎乘適用
- 遍佈整件褲子的反光滾邊設計
- 右褲管設計有隱藏式反折 Rapha 反光標誌
- 強韌耐用的強化縫線
- 可收納重要物品的拉鏈口袋
材質：
- 94% 尼龍
- 6% 彈性纖維
Q&A
瀏覽常見問題保養說明
- 30ºC 機洗
- 請勿漂白
- 低溫機器烘乾
- 請勿熨燙
- 請勿乾洗
- 請勿熨燙褲身圖案
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Marwood from
A major downgrade
I bought these, thinking they'd be the same as the Technical Trousers I bought a year ago but they were completely different and a little worse in every way. The design was simpler, using a cheaper-feeling fabric throughout, rather than a differing fabrics for the outer and linings. No zippers on pockets and tighter cut around the thighs mean they're less useful on the bike. They're just over-priced hiking pants now.
Date published: 2023-09-19
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Anonymous from
Taken cost out of previous generation trousers
Good but not as good as old version . Reason is clear - by removing zips from front pockets and changing other details they removed cost from manufacture while maintaining retail cost . Shame. Keep dripping these kind of commercial decisions through the product range and they will kill the brand - hey but maybe they know they are moving downmarket ? Who knows
Date published: 2023-06-26
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Maverick Rider from
Returned: If you own the originals don’t buy these
I LOVE the original technical trousers and own several. Purchased these for the new color. SHOCKED by the step down in design and fabric - especially the pockets. The fabric is thin and does not lay well (question how they will hold up). The pockets are no longer sleek with zippers. This new version feels cheap all around. I returned them. Too bad.
Date published: 2023-07-06
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Henry L from
Previous version was better
They had a previous version of these trousers that tapered in at the bottom and had zips on the main pockets. They were just better trousers and I miss those being made.
This doesn’t detract from them being well made and a good pair of trouser / chino just a bit gutted they changed them.
Date published: 2023-07-02
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Cwoods from
Major step backwards
The new style is terrible. No zipper pockets, strange fit and sizing. Please bring back the previous version. Not sure what’s happening at Rapha but all of my favorite pieces of kit are getting redesigned, and not in a good way IMHO.
Date published: 2023-08-20
Rated 3 out of
5
by
gwbaun from
Rapha Jettisons Quality
I own 6 pair of these technical pants. I was very disappointed to see Rapha eliminated the zippers on the side and back pockets. What was the point. Very stupid an cheap. I’m very disappointed to note that Rapha is losing its identity. Not the quality I am used to, and definitel loss of style.
Date published: 2023-10-29
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Rapha buyer from
new Rapha trousers 2023
The cut has changed. Pockets are also different. OK but not as good as the old one.
Date published: 2023-07-07
Rated 3 out of
5
by
nbm757 from
Comfortable pants, but too baggy and long
comfortable and breathe well while biking. Look decent around the office. Pants are way too baggy and the selection of waist and length combinations is bizarre. The fact that I can't find a 30 inch length mixed with a 32 or a 34 waist is annoying. The 32 inch length has been way too long but I've been able to make it work by rolling the pant leg up slightly.
Date published: 2023-08-16
Would these fit a woman? Please make women’s fit!
Yes, if you know your inseam and waist measurement this will help you find the best fit for you.
Date published: 2024-01-12
can you share the actual length of this product?
The inseam lengths are 28 / 31.5 / 32 inches across sizes.
Date published: 2024-01-31
What are the waist and inseam sizes for W28-L28, W28-L31.5, and W30?
W28 = 38cm half / 76cm full
W30 = 40.5cm half / 81cm full
L28 = Short length
L31.5 = Regular length
L32= Long length
Date published: 2023-10-03
Hi, please advise what is the length of the L32 in cm? I'm in the middle between L32 / L34 so would be great to know! Thank!
Hello, the leg length on both of these sizes are listed as L and because of this the both will have a 87 cm inseam.
Date published: 2023-09-23
Can you share the actual waist dimensions vs. tagged size?
28 = 38cm half / 76cm full
30 = 40.5cm half / 81cm full
32 = 43cm half / 86cm full
34 = 45.5cm half / 91cm full
36 = 48cm half / 96cm full
Date published: 2023-09-22
From the pictures of the grey and black version of the pants, it appears that the reflective logo inside the leg is on the *left* side, in contrast to the description in the text and all other colours, where the reflective logo is on the right side?
The print on the inside pant leg is on the right leg (drivetrain side).
Date published: 2023-10-20
How wide is the the bottom opening of the pant
28 = 17.2cm half / 34.4cm full
30 = 18cm half / 36cm full
32 = 18.8cm half / 37.6cm full
34 = 19.3cm half /38.6cm full
36 = 20.1cm half / 40.2cm full
Date published: 2023-09-22
How large is the leg opening at the ankle?
28 = 17.2cm half / 34.4cm full
30 = 18cm half / 36cm full
32 = 18.8cm half / 37.6cm full
34 = 19.3cm half /38.6cm full
36 = 20.1cm half / 40.2cm full
Date published: 2024-01-26
感謝您詢問Men's Technical Trousers有貨時我們將通知您。