Rated 3 von
5 von
Marwood aus
A major downgradeI bought these, thinking they'd be the same as the Technical Trousers I bought a year ago but they were completely different and a little worse in every way. The design was simpler, using a cheaper-feeling fabric throughout, rather than a differing fabrics for the outer and linings. No zippers on pockets and tighter cut around the thighs mean they're less useful on the bike. They're just over-priced hiking pants now.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-09-19
Rated 3 von
5 von
Anonym aus
Taken cost out of previous generation trousersGood but not as good as old version . Reason is clear - by removing zips from front pockets and changing other details they removed cost from manufacture while maintaining retail cost . Shame. Keep dripping these kind of commercial decisions through the product range and they will kill the brand - hey but maybe they know they are moving downmarket ? Who knows
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-06-26
Rated 1 von
5 von
Maverick Rider aus
Returned: If you own the originals don’t buy theseI LOVE the original technical trousers and own several. Purchased these for the new color. SHOCKED by the step down in design and fabric - especially the pockets. The fabric is thin and does not lay well (question how they will hold up). The pockets are no longer sleek with zippers. This new version feels cheap all around. I returned them. Too bad.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-07-06
Rated 3 von
5 von
Henry L aus
Previous version was betterThey had a previous version of these trousers that tapered in at the bottom and had zips on the main pockets. They were just better trousers and I miss those being made.
This doesn’t detract from them being well made and a good pair of trouser / chino just a bit gutted they changed them.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-07-02
Rated 1 von
5 von
Cwoods aus
Major step backwardsThe new style is terrible. No zipper pockets, strange fit and sizing. Please bring back the previous version. Not sure what’s happening at Rapha but all of my favorite pieces of kit are getting redesigned, and not in a good way IMHO.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-08-20
Rated 3 von
5 von
gwbaun aus
Rapha Jettisons QualityI own 6 pair of these technical pants. I was very disappointed to see Rapha eliminated the zippers on the side and back pockets. What was the point. Very stupid an cheap. I’m very disappointed to note that Rapha is losing its identity. Not the quality I am used to, and definitel loss of style.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-10-29
Rated 3 von
5 von
Rapha buyer aus
new Rapha trousers 2023The cut has changed. Pockets are also different. OK but not as good as the old one.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-07-07
Rated 3 von
5 von
nbm757 aus
Comfortable pants, but too baggy and longcomfortable and breathe well while biking. Look decent around the office. Pants are way too baggy and the selection of waist and length combinations is bizarre. The fact that I can't find a 30 inch length mixed with a 32 or a 34 waist is annoying. The 32 inch length has been way too long but I've been able to make it work by rolling the pant leg up slightly.
Would these fit a woman? Please make women’s fit!
Gefragt von: Dresseslikeaman
Yes, if you know your inseam and waist measurement this will help you find the best fit for you.
Beantwortet von: Caitlin Rapha
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-01-12
can you share the actual length of this product?
Gefragt von: takeo
The inseam lengths are 28 / 31.5 / 32 inches across sizes.
Beantwortet von: Rapha CS APAC
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-01-31
What are the waist and inseam sizes for W28-L28, W28-L31.5, and W30?
Gefragt von: ilichpak
W28 = 38cm half / 76cm full
W30 = 40.5cm half / 81cm full
L28 = Short length
L31.5 = Regular length
L32= Long length
Beantwortet von: Rapha CS APAC
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-10-03
Hi, please advise what is the length of the L32 in cm? I'm in the middle between L32 / L34 so would be great to know! Thank!
Gefragt von: Bart76
Hello, the leg length on both of these sizes are listed as L and because of this the both will have a 87 cm inseam.
Beantwortet von: RebeccaC
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-05-11
Can you share the actual waist dimensions vs. tagged size?
Gefragt von: BeEff
28 = 38cm half / 76cm full
30 = 40.5cm half / 81cm full
32 = 43cm half / 86cm full
34 = 45.5cm half / 91cm full
36 = 48cm half / 96cm full
Beantwortet von: HannahH
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-09-22
From the pictures of the grey and black version of the pants, it appears that the reflective logo inside the leg is on the *left* side, in contrast to the description in the text and all other colours, where the reflective logo is on the right side?
Gefragt von: Shining Raven
The print on the inside pant leg is on the right leg (drivetrain side).
Beantwortet von: HannahH
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-10-20
How wide is the the bottom opening of the pant
Gefragt von: TCR1
28 = 17.2cm half / 34.4cm full
30 = 18cm half / 36cm full
32 = 18.8cm half / 37.6cm full
34 = 19.3cm half /38.6cm full
36 = 20.1cm half / 40.2cm full
Beantwortet von: HannahH
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-09-22
How large is the leg opening at the ankle?
Gefragt von: AWL3
28 = 17.2cm half / 34.4cm full
30 = 18cm half / 36cm full
32 = 18.8cm half / 37.6cm full
34 = 19.3cm half /38.6cm full
36 = 20.1cm half / 40.2cm full