Free shipping on orders over €100,00 with free returns

Close

Description

Key Features:

  • A versatile technical trouser for city riding and casual wear
  • Made with double weave fabric for long-lasting durability
  • Durable water repellent (DWR) finish for light shower protection
  • Lightly textured backer for extra comfort against the skin
  • Two front and rear pockets with a zipped side pocket for optimal, secure storage
  • Higher back for added coverage on the bike
  • See more on- and off-bike items in our full Lifestyle collections

How to wear:

Details and Materials

  • Recommended for city riding in cool to warm conditions
  • Reflective trim throughout product
  • Concealed turn-up reflective Rapha logo on right leg
  • Durable, reinforced seams
  • Zip pockets for essentials storage

Materials:

  • 94% Nylon
  • 6% Spandex

3.9

3.9 / 5

43 Reviews

Read Reviews

Q&A

View questions

Care instructions

  • Machine wash 30ºC
  • Do not bleach
  • Tumble dry cool
  • Do not iron
  • Do not dry clean
  • Do not iron motif
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Taken cost out of previous generation trousers Good but not as good as old version . Reason is clear - by removing zips from front pockets and changing other details they removed cost from manufacture while maintaining retail cost . Shame. Keep dripping these kind of commercial decisions through the product range and they will kill the brand - hey but maybe they know they are moving downmarket ? Who knows
Date published: 2023-06-26
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Returned: If you own the originals don’t buy these I LOVE the original technical trousers and own several. Purchased these for the new color. SHOCKED by the step down in design and fabric - especially the pockets. The fabric is thin and does not lay well (question how they will hold up). The pockets are no longer sleek with zippers. This new version feels cheap all around. I returned them. Too bad.
Date published: 2023-07-06
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Previous version was better They had a previous version of these trousers that tapered in at the bottom and had zips on the main pockets. They were just better trousers and I miss those being made. This doesn’t detract from them being well made and a good pair of trouser / chino just a bit gutted they changed them.
Date published: 2023-07-02
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Major step backwards The new style is terrible. No zipper pockets, strange fit and sizing. Please bring back the previous version. Not sure what’s happening at Rapha but all of my favorite pieces of kit are getting redesigned, and not in a good way IMHO.
Date published: 2023-08-20
Rated 3 out of 5 by from A major downgrade I bought these, thinking they'd be the same as the Technical Trousers I bought a year ago but they were completely different and a little worse in every way. The design was simpler, using a cheaper-feeling fabric throughout, rather than a differing fabrics for the outer and linings. No zippers on pockets and tighter cut around the thighs mean they're less useful on the bike. They're just over-priced hiking pants now.
Date published: 2023-09-19
Rated 3 out of 5 by from new Rapha trousers 2023 The cut has changed. Pockets are also different. OK but not as good as the old one.
Date published: 2023-07-07
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Comfortable pants, but too baggy and long comfortable and breathe well while biking. Look decent around the office. Pants are way too baggy and the selection of waist and length combinations is bizarre. The fact that I can't find a 30 inch length mixed with a 32 or a 34 waist is annoying. The 32 inch length has been way too long but I've been able to make it work by rolling the pant leg up slightly.
Date published: 2023-08-16
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Too baggy The fit of these pants isn’t consistent with previous models. They are much more baggy than previous models and didn’t find them suitable for cycling in. Pity because the materials are an upgrade from before. Felt great but too baggy.
Date published: 2023-07-07
  • y_2023, m_11, d_29, h_8
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.37
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_34
  • loc_en_DE, sid_RDT04XX, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_rapha
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-2.3.0.0
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 0ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT

can you share the actual length of this product?

Asked by: takeo
The inseam lengths are 28 / 31.5 / 32 inches across sizes.
Answered by: Rapha CS APAC
Date published: 2023-10-05

What are the waist and inseam sizes for W28-L28, W28-L31.5, and W30?

Asked by: ilichpak
W28 = 38cm half / 76cm full W30 = 40.5cm half / 81cm full L28 = Short length L31.5 = Regular length L32= Long length
Answered by: Rapha CS APAC
Date published: 2023-10-03

Hi, please advise what is the length of the L32 in cm? I'm in the middle between L32 / L34 so would be great to know! Thank!

Asked by: Bart76
Hello, the leg length on both of these sizes are listed as L and because of this the both will have a 87 cm inseam.
Answered by: RebeccaC
Date published: 2023-09-19

Can you share the actual waist dimensions vs. tagged size?

Asked by: BeEff
28 = 38cm half / 76cm full 30 = 40.5cm half / 81cm full 32 = 43cm half / 86cm full 34 = 45.5cm half / 91cm full 36 = 48cm half / 96cm full
Answered by: HannahH
Date published: 2023-07-12

From the pictures of the grey and black version of the pants, it appears that the reflective logo inside the leg is on the *left* side, in contrast to the description in the text and all other colours, where the reflective logo is on the right side? 

Asked by: Shining Raven
The print on the inside pant leg is on the right leg (drivetrain side).
Answered by: HannahH
Date published: 2023-07-22

How wide is the the bottom opening of the pant

Asked by: TCR1
28 = 17.2cm half / 34.4cm full 30 = 18cm half / 36cm full 32 = 18.8cm half / 37.6cm full 34 = 19.3cm half /38.6cm full 36 = 20.1cm half / 40.2cm full
Answered by: HannahH
Date published: 2023-06-27

How large is the leg opening at the ankle?

Asked by: AWL3
28 = 17.2cm half / 34.4cm full 30 = 18cm half / 36cm full 32 = 18.8cm half / 37.6cm full 34 = 19.3cm half /38.6cm full 36 = 20.1cm half / 40.2cm full
Answered by: HannahH
Date published: 2023-06-22

From the photos I get the impression that the technical trousers are more loose fitting and less tapered than the previous version. Is that correct?

Asked by: Picknicker
Correct, these have been redesigned with a more relaxed contemporary style to the previous Randonnee Trouser. The feature set is similar between both styles, with the main difference being the silhouette.
Answered by: HannahH
Date published: 2023-05-10
  • y_2023, m_11, d_29, h_8CST
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvqa, vn_bulk_3.0.37
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasquestionsanswers, tq_10
  • loc_en_DE, sid_RDT04XX, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=LAST_APPROVED_ANSWER_SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_rapha
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-2.3.0.0
  • CLOUD, getContent, 124ms
  • QUESTIONS, PRODUCT

Thank you for your request. We’ll contact you when your Men's Technical Trousers is available.

  2. » Men's Products
  3. » Shorts & Trousers
  4. » Men's Technical Trousers

We will soon be retiring support for your browser

If you continue browsing rapha.cc using your current browser, you may experience reduced performance. We suggest you download one of the modern browsers below for optimal experience on rapha.cc.

Download Chrome firefox-logo Download Firefox
I can only use IE11

Thanks for letting us know

Dismiss this message

We use cookies to improve our site and your shopping experience, and have recently updated our cookie policy. By continuing to browse our site you accept this policy. You can delete and block the cookies by changing your browser settings.

Accept & close